Human rihgts are, in fact, the most controversial issues in modern era. Until to date, differenct countries have different interpretations of human rights depending on geographical locations and cultural values and practices. Much of dichotomy in the context of Middle East and Asian countries, the language of human rights is viewed as derived from western ideology and value owing to upholding beliefs that people in those countries are more religious persona. Against though they are, this theory has been widely materialized nowadays. However, this conceptualization of human rights have long been appeared since 16th century. They are, however, widely and highly used after the post era of world war II.

Human rights constitute individuals as a particular kind of political subject free and equal rights-bearing citizens. It is, of course, the rights for every human beings. This particular subject connotes a variety of interpretations by scholars. However, it is of my interest to draw attention to human rights liberal or liberal view on human rights in other hand. Respective of liberal views on human rights, its principle holds equality, liberty and freedom. Logically, its theoractical approach therefore is that you have human rights because you exist and consequently, this view can be extensively justified and defined as belonging to all living creatures accordingly.

Generally speaking, one of the conceptual elements of the human rights hold steadfast by liberals is inviolable rights because one can not interfere within the boundary of other and violate their rights. They value individual rights in establishing relationship between government and citizenry but that consequently limit on government.  

To provide some facts for human rights liberal, these are impetus factors as follows; liberty, individual, universal, equality, inviolable rights, social contract, open society and pluralism, tolerance and diversity. With that being mentioned about the general concept, the prima facie exercise would be that human rigths are universal, applied equally to all, bound in society fibric, not isolated and movable and natural. These claims are validated by liberal ideologists.

Equality and freedom perspectives regard that individual freedom is the highest  morality because it is believed that every single of human beings is equally created and equally free. Furthermore, one of the essences of human rights is free speech is a fundamental tenet of liberal thought and vital to human rights liberal. It is, too, important that free speech allows exchange of ideas through debate according to Julia Assange in his mention of human rights between government and individual. Nevertheless, Jack Donnelly argued that we must therefore not fall into the trap of speaking of human rights as demands for rights. In a sense, liberty and freedom, which go hand in hand, seems to be the core value.

To sum up, the universal declaration of human rights is, too, enshrined within the framework of liberal ideology that presents a standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations. At the bottom, people, who conceived the profound principles stated above, are human rights liberal in general.